Nau Do Gyarah (1957) – Breezy Classic Road Movie

5–8 minutes

Genre: Road Movie / Road comedy

Platform: You Tube Free

Time: 2 hours 35 minutes  

Story, Screenplay, Director: Vijay Anand

Cast:   Dev Anand (Madan). Raksha (Kalpana Karthik). Jeevan (Surjit). Madan Puri (Radheshyam “Radhey”). Shashikala (Neeta). Krishan Dhawan (Kuldeep). Lalita Pawar (Kuldeep’s mother).

Plot: Totally broke and thrown out of his rented home, Madan learns that he is heir to a fortune of 11 lakhs left by his late uncle in Mahabaleshwar. En route, he encounters a runaway woman Raksha, who initially dresses up as a male Sardar Nihal Singh. Soon the cat is out of the bag and a romance develops. Madan reaches Bombay and informs his friend Radhey about both the fortune and his new found woman in his life. Radhey promises to help. Madan and Raksha pretend to be a married couple to stay at Mahabaleshwar and to find out about the uncle’s mysterious death…

Twenty-three-year-old Vijay Anand wrote the story, screenplay and directed the film. Modern viewers may scream about ‘nepo brothers’ and similar stuff but in this case Vijay Anand’s deft and firm touch in all departments was clearly visible. Goldie as Vijay Anand was popularly known, really had a golden touch when it came to the box office and this was his first collaboration with big brother and producer, Dev Anand. The pair reached its peak with the stylish 1967 thriller Jewel Thief but that’s for another day and time.

Nau Do Gyarah can be easily said to be Hindi / Indian cinema’s first ever ‘road movie’ and a very loose adaptation of It happened one night (1934), the only commonality being that the lead female character is a runaway heiress. It happened one night was remade at least three times in Hindi Cinema as Solva Saal, Chori Chori and Dil hai ke maanta nahi, the last being the most ‘true’ to the original, right down to scenes being almost copy-pasted.

As we all know, a road movie is where two characters, usually men of opposite temperaments, go or are forced to share a car / bus on a journey. If it’s a man and a woman, typically romance follows. Usually, the lead male and female actor essay the lead characters, making it easy for the audience to identify with the lead pair as they embark on a journey. If it is two men on a journey, either they will bond as friends or in some extreme cases, end up as antagonists, leading to violent climactic scenes.

A cursory look at the outdoor makes it clear that some scenes were definitely shot outdoors in Delhi, Bombay and Mahabaleshwar. This is one of the few films where Dev Anand, in keeping with the character, doesn’t keep changing his clothes from scene to scene. His acting has also a light comic, almost self-deprecatory touch as befitting a character who is broke and penniless, yet defiant to ask for help as in the scene where ‘Sardar Nihal Singh” offers to pay for the petrol for his onward journey to Bombay.

The romantic development naturally follows after the initial fights and the usual haughty acts of a rich haughty woman who has escaped her home from a marriage against her will since the groom Surjit was demanding more money, moments before the marriage. By the long arm of coincidence, Jasjit turns up at Mahabaleshwar with a girlfriend Neeta, who is also enticing Kuldeep with her feminine charm.

A Navketan film without music would be an anomaly. Navketan’s “House Composer” S.D.Burman gives an overall lightweight touch to the proceedings as befitting a romantic comedy cum road movie. Most of the songs have become classics barring the ‘club’ numbers and the unique climatic song with an integrated fight sequence. Since its one of my favorite Dev Anand films and favorite SD Burman albums, lets look at the songs and the order in which they appear in the film, for which SD Burman’s favorite lyricist Majrooh Sultanpuri does immense justice as per the song situation. (Both Burman and Majrooh shared the same date of birth, October 1)

  1. Hum hai raahi pyar ke humse kuch na boliye – a broke Madan leaves Delhi on his onward journey to Bombay. Kishore Kumar gives the song a lightweight touch and the whistle interludes remain unique. Immediately after this song, Madan spies the stowaway Raksha in his truck. The song was reused in Dil hai ke maanta nahi when the lead couple dance slowly to the song in a remote stop, while the song plays on a radio.
  2. Kali ke roop me chali ho dhoop me – the haughty Raksha , now in a female dress, is on foot , talking about how she can walk alone on the hot road while Madan sitting comfortable in the driver’s shaded cabin, teases her. Mohammed Rafi’s special velvet ‘Dev Anand’ voice complements Asha Bhosle singing for the heroine Kalpana Karthik.
  3. Aankhon me kya jee rupahla baadal – This Kishore- Asha duet was almost banned as it was felt by the censors that it was full of sexual innuendo! Especially the line “Aachal me kya jee, ajab see hulchul”. So much for censors! The light romantic duet shows Madan and Raksha’s growing affection for each other
  4. Kya ho jo din rangeela ho – This Geeta Dutt – Asha duet fulfils one standard trope of those years, for a ‘club dance. Geeta Dutt sings for Shashikala while Asha sings for Helen who appears only in this song.
  5. Oh aaja panchi akela hai – Madan and Raksha are supposedly husband and wife but they live in separate rooms, he in the bathroom and she in the bedroom. Hence his playful suggestion and her retort to go to sleep, yet another breezy, playful Rafi-Asha romantic duets.
  6. Dhalti jaaye chundariya – Asha sings for Raksha who is expressing her new found love.
  7. Jaane jigar haay haaye – Asha sings for Neeta who is trying to seduce Madan. At the song’s end , a jealous Raksha throws a stone at Madan who in the next scene explains to an amused Raksha that a crow bit him on the head.
  8. See le zubaan – this is probably one of the most unique song picturisation ever in the history of Indian films. While Kuldeep and Surjit are fighting , Neeta is warning Kudeep’s mother not to say anything in front of Madan. The fight goes on and so does the song ! Unique and in no way distracting. Goldie had mastered the art of integrating the song and the scene.

4, 6,7,8 were not numbers that had lots of airplay while the other songs four songs were super hits and could be heard in almost all ‘retro’ radio programs on AIR and Radio Ceylon.

Its also worth mentioning that the choreography was by Zohra Sehgal. The same Zohra Sehgal whom most late 20th and 21st century audiences know as the loveable and or cranky granny.

Overall, the songs, the story and the screenplay are so deftly woven that we fail to appreciate the superb craftsman that was Goldie who integrated everything into a film that can be classified as India’s first ever road movie. Dev Anand and his wife Kalpana Kartik, in her last onscreen appearance, also show some lovely onscreen chemistry, befitting the film’s overall lightweight breezy structure. For its time, it may have been a risk for such a unique theme, but it proved to be a box office hit

The film is free on You Tube

https://youtu.be/sHqlMGEkU40?t=1


Script – 5 out of 5

Story – 5 out of 5

Music – 4 out of 5

Direction – 5 out of 5

Photography – 4 out of 5

Total – 4.6 out of 5

3 comments on Nau Do Gyarah (1957) – Breezy Classic Road Movie

Apur Sansar (1959) – Classic / Apu Trilogy part 3

3–5 minutes

Genre: Human Drama

Platform: Free on You Tube with English subtitles

Time: 1 hour 50 minutes  

Director: Satyajit Ray

Cast:   Soumitra Chatterjee (Apurba “Apu” Kumar Roy). Sharmila Tagore (Aparna Roy, Apu’s wife). Swapan Mukherjee (Pulu, Apu’s friend). Dhiren Ghosh (Apu’s landlord). Dhiresh Majumdar (Sasinarayan, Aparna’s father). Alok Chakravarty (Kajal Roy, Apu and Aparna’s son).

Plot: Apu quits college in Inter and wishes to find a job. He and his friend Pulu go to Pulu’s village to attend his cousin Aparna’s wedding but Apu ends up getting to Aparna, since the groom turns out to be mentally unstable. Apu brings Aparna to Calcutta and she is appalled at his existence in a single room atop a tenement. Soon she adjusts and they find married bliss in their simple existence where she manages the home and he earns money by giving tuitions. Aparna goes back to her native village and dies at childbirth…

Spoiler Alert:

Let me start with the film’s last scene / ending; working backwards, (hopefully) the essence of this human story becomes clearer.                              

Apu’s estranged 5 year old son Kajal: Tumi Kaun (who are you)?

Apu: Aami tomar bandhu (I am your friend)

Life has come full circle for Apu. Hope. to Confidence. to Love. to Anger and Despair. And once again Hope.

From being an orphan, to a student, to a married man who loses his wife at childbirth and finally becoming a friend to his five-year-old son who is running wild, (since the child lacks any kind of authority figure to ‘control’ him), Apu has undergone the full life cycle, while still in his 20s.

At the film’s beginning, Apu sets out to get a job. His college professor wishes that he continues his studies but Apu is clear that lack of money prevents him from continuing his science education. On a journey to his friend Pulu’s native town Khulna, Pulu reads Apu’s novel and urges him to get it published but fate has other plans in the shape of Pulu’s young teenage cousin Aparna, played with incredible absolute confidence by a then 15-year-old Sharmila Tagore, who Apu is forced to marry out of a sense of saving the girl’s honor and future.

Losing her to the rigors of childbirth. Losing interest in life. Working in a remote mine and sending money to his father-in- law to take care of Kajal. Apu’s overall depression and anger is brought out well in these scenes. He is bitter that life has dealt a bad hand to him . So much that he even doesn’t want anything to do with his son.

Once again it is Pulu’s intervention that proves critical. Pulu brought him to the marriage and Aparna. It is Pulu again who traces the child Kajal and the father Apu, and brings them together. Pulu’s job is over. Will Kajal and Apu live as father and son? The answer is provided by Apu himself to Kajal ; aami tomar bandhu.

In my view this is an ideal conclusion to the story which is actually from the second half of the novel Aparajito. The full circle of life that started with Apu’s birth and his journey till date is known to us . Aparna’s death acts as one more among the many blows that life has dealt him. Yet he comes out of it and despite not knowing what the future holds, he moves on with his ‘bandhu’. As to what Apu and his “bandhu’ will do in the future and what life holds for them is left to our imagination.

Lyrical is the word that frequently comes to my mind while watching the film. The pace is even and the third film of the trilogy shows Ray , the master observer of human emotions, in complete command of the medium. Be it a small river in rural Bengal or a dank tenement near a railway yard, the images that leap out of the screen onto us show the realities of life as seen by Apu (and by us). Subrata Mitra’s cinematography again shows the contrast between the peaceful rural areas and Apu’s somewhat harried life in his one room rooftop tenement that is open to the elements. The film also began Ray’s long association with Soumitra Chatterjee who remained his preferred lead actor well into the 1980s, acting in 14 of Ray’s films, in varying roles.

As the end titles appear, we wish that there had been more about Kajal and his bandhu and we could have known more about them and what happened to them. This is easily the most perfect film of the trilogy and a classic by any definition.

The film is free on You Tube

Script – 5 out of 5

Story – 5 out of 5

Direction – 5 out of 5

Photography – 5 out of 5

Total – 5 out of 5

1 comment on Apur Sansar (1959) – Classic / Apu Trilogy part 3

Aparajito (1956) – Classic / Apu Trilogy Part 2

3–4 minutes

Genre: Human Drama

Platform: Amazon Prime / You Tube Free

Time: 1 hour 50 minutes  

Director: Satyajit Ray

Cast:   Kanu Banerjee (Harihar Roy). Karuna Banerjee (Sarbajaya Roy). Pinaki Sengupta (young Apurba “Apu” ). Smaran Ghosal (Apu – adolescent). Ramani Ranjan Sengupta (Apu’s great uncle).

Plot: Apu’s father Hairhar is still struggling to make ends meet with his wife Sarbajaya, in Varanasi where they had shifted. Young Apu is just wandering around, playing with neighboring kids. Hari dies and an uncle helps them to return to a village so that Apu can take up the family tradition of priesthood. Apu however in interested in studying and proves to be a bright student, winning second prize in the district due to which he gets a chance to study in Calcutta. Sarbajaya is fearful but the adolescent Apu wants to learn science and goes off to Calcutta where he works in a printing press at night while studying in a college during daytime, struggling to balancing sleep, studies, friendship and money…

This is the second Apu story, written by novelist Bibhutibhushan Bandopadhyay. This is also an unusual film from Ray in that it shows that Apu is not all that loyal to his parents, especially later to his struggling mother and even insensitive to her loneliness and pain – totally in contrast with how children were always shown loyal in various Indian language films. Apu emerges almost as ruthlessly selfish as befitting any teenager who thinks only about himself and doesn’t care what’s happening in his village home. Sarbajaya’s longing look at the distant railway tracks every time a train passes on the horizon, speaks volumes about her feelings than any long sets of dialogues can say or mean.

Apu is also discovering a world beyond his supposedly simple village life – the complexity of living in a city, earning his bread, paying his rent and studying. The professor who discovers Apu sleeping in the class and sends him out reminded me of one of my school principals who would rarely speak but just gesture with his fingers – as the onscreen professor does 😊.

Apu’s disinterest in priesthood and leanings towards science also makes a subtle point about how Apu looks at the world. His constant twirling of the small globe, which he carries around, shows a desire to go beyond his small world and look for adventures beyond his own world. He finds it in multiple ways and especially as a student, who is forced to balance his life between his village / mother, his studies, his job, and generally dealing with life. As mentioned earlier, Apu emerges as a somewhat selfish person, who thinks only about himself. Sarbajaya’s lonely death, shown in multiple cuts with her gradually fading away, cuts the last bond which Apu had with the village. Though he regrets not being there in her last moments, he tells his uncle that he will perform her last rites in Calcutta and leaves everything behind . He is now a full-fledged city man, awaiting new adventures beyond his limited world view.

Once again Subrata Mitra’s outstanding cinematography deserves a special mention. Be it the Varanasi ghats or lanes, or a steam train on the horizon as seen by Sarbajaya, almost everything leaps off the screen in utter crisp clarity.

To me, the film looks is a bit underwhelming. Maybe its the second film in a trilogy where everything is yet to develop and we do not know what Apu will grow into, since Apu is trying to find his place in the world – exactly like Ray, with his second film was trying to do so. Despite my misplaced feelings, the film cant be faulted in its story of a boy growing into a teenager and suddenly encountering the world and becoming a man.

The film is on Amazon Prime and FREE on You Tube . You tube link as below:

https://youtu.be/scgyxNLiAL8?t=35


Script – 5 out of 5

Story – 4 out of 5

Direction – 5 out of 5

Photography – 5 out of 5

Total – 4.8 out of 5

2 responses to “Aparajito (1956) – Classic / Apu Trilogy Part 2”

  1. Robin Bhat avatar
    Robin Bhat

    Hi Rammesh,

    Just an aside on Subrata Mitra:

    His entry at Wikipedia is worth reading, as it relates to the pioneering use of ‘bounce lighting’ in the Satyajit Ray films.

    On the Hindi film side – Teesri Kasam.

    IMHO, never has Waheeda Rehman looked as majestic as she does in this film, thanks to the lens of Subrata Misra.

    An ace cinematographer such as him (and a select few in the Indian Film Industry) demonstrate to us that it is in accurate to call it a ‘black-and-white film’.

    Their masterworks use two primary colors: pure black and pure white… and the infinite number of fractional color values between them, beyond what the human eye can decipher.

    Thanks,

    Robin

    1. Rammesh avatar
      Rammesh

      Robin

      Thanks. Will check it out . As a rule I try NOT to check ANY reference site, (at the most imdb for the artist names) lest it interfere with what I have to say ;).

      Now that you have mentioned it, I will check it out. Thanks again.

      KVR

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pather Panchali (1955) – Classic / Apu Trilogy part 1

4–6 minutes

Genre: Human Drama

Platform: Amazon (Rent) You Tube Free

Time: 1 hour 50 minutes  

Director: Satyajit Ray

Cast:   Kanu Banerjee (Harihar Roy). Karuna Banerjee (Sarbajaya Roy). Subir Banerjee (Apurba “Apu” Roy). Uma Dasgupta (Durga Roy). Chunibala Devi (Indira Thakrun, the old aunt).

Plot: Apu is born to a poor priest Harihar, who is struggling to make ends meet with his wife Sarbajaya, and their daughter Durga. His wife resents the presence of an old aunt, who she feels is spoiling her daughter. Hari goes out of the village to multiple towns to earn money while Apu grows up in the village, learns about village life and sees the world through his innocent eyes. Sarbajaya worries about the lack of food, money and news of Hari…

The story by novelist  Bibhutibhushan Bandyopadhyay was published in 1929. The film places the events in the same time period and has a total rural ambience including practices of the rural areas such as a village play (jatra), child marriage of girls who are generally uneducated , being married off at a very early age and an overall sense of rustic peace which will be surely broken by some kind of calamity.

The overall atmosphere is hardly doom laden but is filled with innocence as Apu sees the world through his eyes and cannot understand why his mother is slaving all the time , cooking, generally helping around while his elder sister Durga is playing with girls of her age . There are minimal dialogues as everything is visual , as Apu sees it. There are no cliches that one expects of films set in rural areas, such as the bad zamindar, the sly/ sympathetic priest , and so on. The village mostly has women doing all the hard household work. The men are barely seen.

Hari is essentially an optimist who feels that “the city’ will have more money and wants to try his chance there. With his meagre belongings he goes off to the city and thus starts Sarbajaya’s agony – not knowing what’s happening. The rare letter that arrives is usually rushed by Apu crying out aloud the arrival of a ‘chitti’.  That the family can read is attributed to Hari being a Sanskrit teacher and helping his family to read, while composing stories and poems .

The supposedly simple village life is not all that simple as it appears to be. Sarbajaya is losing both her mental peace and must borrow money, leading to taunts and pressure from her lenders, to pay up or else. The expected tragedy as and when it happens is something that no one is prepared for. Apu also can’t understand what’s happening except that he sees his elder sister is not around any more . Durga’s death attains a more poignant tone when Hari returns with money from his various city jobs, including clothes for the family and learns of Durga’s death.

The final shot shows that Hari has had enough of the sufferings in his village and is leaving his village for the city. A snake entering Hari’s derelict broken house is the symbol that the house is inhabitable for humans. Its amazing that as early as 1929, someone had addressed the essential reason for migration from a simple rural life to an existence in a harsh uncaring city. The stage is set for part 2 and part 3 of the trilogy.

Overall the feeling of the film is like a blank canvas on which colours and shades are slowly filled. The poverty is not bleak but somehow the couple manage and finally throw in the towel. They may have been defeated for the time being but there are new adventures ahead, as seen through Apu’s eyes.

The simplicity of the film lies in its essence of everything seen through Apu’s eyes. Especially the scene where Apu and Durga rush to a railway line to see a train pass through as they have only heard its whistle and never seen it at close quarters. One of Durga’s friends being married off has its own poignancy as Durga also feels that maybe its time for her too. Durga is also accused of stealing a necklace from one of her friends but which is not found by anyone until much later , Apu finds it and quietly disposes it off at a nearby pond, thus cementing his jump from childish innocence to semi adulthood.

Personal Note: For me the village scenes, with the children running around, brought back vivid memories of my summer holidays, in my father’s village . It was his elder brother’s huge property which grew lots of vegetables and fruits . I and my cousins would run around plucking fruits or throwing stones at semi ripe mangos so that we could catch and eat them. It was a carefree time, and I can relate to Apu’s views of the village life.

The film wouldn’t be what it is , if not for the absolutely stunning photography by Subrata Mitra which shows every leaf, plant, dew drop and tree in exquisite sharp detail. The depth of focus is amazing in the long shots.

Overall this is a film that is a sure classic about the beginnings of Apu’s journey into adolescence, into adulthood and facing the thing called life.

Script – 5 out of 5

Story – 5 out of 5

Direction – 5 out of 5

Photography – 5 out of 5

Total – 5 out of 5

5 responses to “Pather Panchali (1955) – Classic / Apu Trilogy part 1”

  1. Ram avatar
    Ram

    Why No mention of Chunibala Devi as Indir Thakrun- who was a scene stealer-

    1. Rammesh avatar
      Rammesh

      Mentioned in passing as “old aunt”

  2. Robin Bhat avatar
    Robin Bhat

    Hi Rammesh,

    Loved reading your review.. will await the next installments of your review of these delicate masterworks.

    (small aside – I once did make the error of watching all three films in a single afternoon… mistake…. in the middle of the third film (Apur Sansar), was simply overwhelmed and left the theatre… (though, I have seen the films separately in the past, and do have the Blu-ray editions)

    Criterion Collection:
    “…shot over the course of five years, and each stands on its own as a tender, visually radiant journey. These films—which have risen from the ashes in meticulously reconstructed restorations, after the original negatives were burned in a fire—are among the most achingly beautiful, richly humane movies ever made.”

    ___
    Best part of your review was your personal note… unrelated (sort of), but immediately reminded me of:

    Aayaa hai mujhe phir yaad vo zalim
    Guzara zamana bachapan ka
    Haay re akele chhod ke jana
    Aur na aanaa bachapan ka……

    Vo khel vo saathi vo jhule
    Vo dod ke kehanaa aa chhu le
    Ham aaj talak bhi na bhule
    Vo khwaab suhana bachapan ka…….

    Mil kar roye fariyad kare
    Un bite dino ki yaad kare
    Ai kash kahi mil jaye koi
    Vo mit purana bachapan ka

    —
    Regards,

    Robin

  3. Lalitha Ravindran avatar
    Lalitha Ravindran

    I like your practice of rewatching films you had seen in childhood again and recording your impressions. Apu Trilogy is truly a classic from a master filmmaker.

    1. Rammesh avatar
      Rammesh

      Hi Lalitha

      Indeed. What was dull is now refreshing . Guess its a matter of perspective that improves with age :)

      KVR

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *